2013년 2월 10일 일요일

IASM (I am Sold Myself!)

http://strideaway.com/ism-i-am-sold-myself/

IASM (I am Sold Myself!)


Thanks to famed Hall of Fame handler John Rex Gates for taking the time to speak with me this past winter at the 2012 National Championship. I asked him if he had any handling tips for amateur newcomers to field trials. John Rex’s advice is pertinent to handling all field trial dogs. Obviously a somewhat different scenario is presented handling dogs from foot in the heavier cover of grouse and woodcock trials where, for example, a tight 10 to 2 cone would restrict the dog’s ability to hunt for birds.
Afterwards, the conversation turned to John Rex’s favorites of the countless dogs he handled to championship wins and what about them he liked. This second conversation will be presented in a separate podcast. The wins listed below reveals a hint.
John Rex Gates retired from field trials 16 years ago having won over 100 Championships as well the Purina Award twice and in 1978, at the age of 38, he became the youngest handler inducted into the Field Trial Hall of Fame.
Some of his important wins include:
National Championship:
1966 with Safari
1972 with The Texas Squire
1997, John Rex won with Dave Grubb’s charge Miller’s Silver Ending when Dave suddenly fell ill. He had never handled the dog before that day!
National Free-for-All Championship
1965 with Paladin’s Royal Flush
1969 with Oklahoma Flush
Continental Championship
1967 with Safari
1975 with Palariel Stormy Clown
1981 with Flush’s Wrangler
+ many Continental Derby Championship wins
Georgia Quail Championship
1969 Haberdasher’s Royal Ace
1971 & 1973 with Oklahoma Flush
1972 with Mission
1976 with The Sultan
1977 with Hiway
+ many Georgia Derby Championship wins
U.S. Open Quail Championship
1970 with The Texas Squire
1972 with Orion Flush
1973 with Oklahoma Flush
Oklahoma Open Championship
1968 with Oklahoma Flush
1970 with Texas Allegheny Pete
1971 with The Texas Squire
1973 & 1975 with Texas Fight
1977 with Hiway
1978 with Flush’s Wrangler
1980 with Tar Hill Ranger

John Rex Gates and John S. Gates with the 1966 National Champion, Safari.


John Rex with Oklahoma Flush.

John Rex with the 1972 National Champion, The Texas Squire.

At the 1981 Continental Championship with winner, Flush’s Wrangler. Runner-up was Karate handled by Freddie Epp.
Here is the podcast interview with John Rex: Strideaway Podcast6_ John Rex Gates
Stay tuned for many more podcast interviews from the 2012 National Championship including conversations with Jack Huffman, Sean Derrig, Ike Todd, Herb Anderson, Nathan Cottrel and John Rex Gates and Colvin Davis telling some tall tales!

What is a Derby? - Bill Allen

http://strideaway.com/what-is-a-derby/

What is a Derby?

                                                                                                                    - Bill Allen

WITHOUT misquoting Tennyson and without attacking or impugning the motives, character, literacy or parentage of anyone living or dead, this writer would like to relieve himself of a burden of thought that has been abuilding for many months — several years, indeed.
It is with great regret that this piece is offered without rib shaking anecdote or without circumlocutionary diatribe, but with the same sincerely ingenuous (not ingenious) interest with which Jonathan Swift offered his “A Modest Proposal” to a jaded empire once on a time…But it may be nevertheless entertaining.
First of all, I would lead you through a remembrance or so. Whether it was at the age of seven (as in my case) or at the age of 27, all of us at one time or another were exposed to a bird dog for the first time. In order to understand the question posed by this piece, we must first of all and firmly establish this experience in our minds, and upon it build the rest of our experience with bird dogs.
Hypothetically, let’s postulate that the first bird dog we saw was old Jake, with a knot on his nose and a hump on his head and a tendency to crouch the closer he got to game. He was broke to a farethee-well. How did he get that way? In succeeding years we found out.
I found out by crawling through briers, honeysuckle and gallberry swamps to flush birds for the grown-ups and then, occasionally becoming very disturbed when younger less well-taught “Jakes” flushed the birds before I could and I got blamed for it because, surely “that dog wouldn’t run up a bird ahead of you, son.”
So let’s say that we broke some dogs. How long did it take? It varies with the dog, you say? Ah, yes, but at what age would you say that a dog — pointer or setter, now — would be ready to fulfill every mission you had attributed to his ability? At what age is a dog
absolutely foolproof? We are talking about dogs now — hunting dogs.
Now with the answers to these questions in mind, let’s settle down to the investigation of the institution known as the Derby stake. The effort here is to stir up thought, not controversy. It seems to me that a Derby should be a Derby within the age limits designated; however, this is not the purpose of this piece. It is the increasing pressure on the dogs entering their Derby year that is disturbing to me, and the consequent loss of great young dog flesh. No matter how anyone is able to re-direct the attention of the judiciary to potential, instead of explicit performance, the fact will remain that if one Derby knocks and
chases a covey and another had clean work and Derby A then has a good find which is matched again by immaculate Derby B, and both have comparably excellent races, then Derby B will win.
True, and I say that the Derby that runs like a Derby and has two finds without error has more potential that day than the one which runs comparably and makes an error. But, still, until the Derby championship competition begins in January, nowadays, more Derbies that point and handle birds flawlessly, and run nice, forward, limited patterns win Derby stakes than the ones which are exhaustive, vibrant, alive, fiery and unpolished. This encourages the whispers and sniggers about overage dogs in Derby stakes, unbreakable old mavericks in puppy stakes and a never-ending flow of winning Derbies which wilt away and are never
heard from again. I don’t know when olden days began and stopped, but even I can remember when Derbies won Derby stakes.
Then, alas, as I write I know all of this will come to little good because there is a hue-and-cry that there is no place to run big reaching field trial dogs anymore, and there is a great deal of thrashing around about this very real problem, and a shrill cry against any plan which involves the state (of Kansas or Massachusetts) providing small game or field trial areas.
This fear is evident and vocal despite the fact that in many states the total outlay for outdoor recreation is equal to the amount it costs to pave twelve miles of two-lane blacktop highway! But that is another story.
Here we are giving the name “Derby” to a stake in which, in many, many cases, the finesse of a champion is required to win. One classic example comes to mind, and I have seen it recurrent in many trials since — as a matter of fact, more recurrent.
One of the very finest ground patterns I have ever seen was naturally run by a young male pointer from the time he got his legs. He added to this as a puppy by knocking all his handler’s chicken on the prairie, and then pointing some of them his second trip in his Derby year. He was such a strong bird dog that he continued to love and point his game, but he would pooosh ’em up; check-cording and soft, kind treatment would not deter him from the convulsive leap. I do not know what happened, but he got broke. He would run as great a race as a Derby as any all age dog then competing on the circuit, but when he pointed, he ended up like a fried egg.
Leave us not fuss about which dog it was. You’d never guess right anyway. Leave us not dwell on the handler, or the helpers, or their apparent mistake. This dog won a Derby back in the States, and he loved his game so much that he would not blink it (as many Derbies will do when you let the hammer down on them), but he would point it his way.
Actually, we all knew even when he won that Derby that he would never win as an all-age dog. But it was the well known demand for all-age manners in a Derby that brought the men charged with developing this dog to take him just that much farther than he was ready to go, before he was ready to go there.
The jeremiad here is not to ask that a sloppy youngster snapping his jaws at birds be placed over one which stands as though hypnotized, their quest and manner of going being equal.’
The clarion call is for a more unified approach to judging the young dog so that the Derbies may all have a natural development as bird dogs in the approach to tone all-age competition. I talked at length with many close friends — professional trainers all — before writing this. One said: “Look, Bill. Listen carefully …Many times the kind of Derby that you’re talking about — the kind that is not quite finished when it comes off the prairie — never is polished, never polishes, never breaks, is always an outlaw. What do you say about that? Should they win over a short running dog the same age that is finished on game?
How many times does it happen?” I asked. “Tell me truthfully the percentage in your experience. You said ‘many times.’”
“Well, I said ‘many times,’ but I didn’t mean that exactly.”
“One out of ten? One in 100? How many times?”
“Blast it, I don’t know. Every few years — one in 100, I guess.”
“Well,” I replied, “you are lucky, and I would say that he still was a good Derby with great potential and the only thing you can do is lament for the absence of the knowledge to harness his potential.
Call it ignorance or call it hard luck, but the fact remains you just said that you have these great Derbies that you can’t break. Somebody else might know how, or they might not. At any rate, you are starting at the wrong end of the syllogism, when you have of your own admission failed to develop the potential that you also admit is there.”
Now, I must admit that this speech did not go over like a Mardi Gras parade with my friend, who is a master with Derbies, but think about it a minute.
And, let’s go back to the shooting dog that Unk or Paw or Gramp had. He was a good bird-finder as a puppy. He pointed a lot the second season, and he was mauled around a lot and toward the end of the season he didn’t point as many birds as he flash pointed as a puppy, and we attributed this to the overshooting of the birds and someone encroaching on our coveys. At the start of the third season, Jake made some young mistakes and was corrected often and harshly, and by the end of that season we suddenly realized that the bird crop was bigger than we figured back before January. The next season, Jake was a brag dog and he continued to get better until he was run over or poisoned, or if you were as lucky as I was, until you finished high school, and he died of old age in the field in a November when you wanted to spend that November forever with him and never go back to college.
Equate this old cold-blooded shooting dog. “L’histoire” with the development of a bird dog destined to compete in field trials, remembering that if we were looking for dogs like this there would be no trials to begin with, and no definition of “class” dogs. As a puppy he races around pell-mell and, if you please, willy-nilly, unless he is a whip-runner, and he chases quail and fairly screams around far away in every direction. Then, a magic moment comes, when he stops and flash points, and you will see that — especially after you have been able to kill him a bird — he will wait for you to get nearly there.
He is becoming a Derby now and a check-cord is in order. Depending on the use of the check-cord and collar, he will not — when you release him before a gallery — show anywhere near the amount of natural hunt, depending on the amount of time it has been necessary to spend bringing him to the front and showing him that’s where he is supposed to be. His bird score goes down, and depending on how much you let the hammer down on him, requiring him to stand for wing and shot, his natural application suffers, for he knows you want him to stay “clean” and remember that a dog’s first and only raison de’etre is to please man! Then, the next year, he begins to come out of it, and though his bird work is spotty (this is the so called “jinx” first all-age year) he has about twice as much as he had as a Derby. The next year, if your luck has been running good, his bird score trebles over his Derby season and you are ready to win with him in all-age stakes. The rest is apocryphal.
Here, I am not writing about the exceptional dog, but about the average as I have seen them in field trials. I would not attempt to prove here by quoting dogs or wins. I would rather let Mister Ed Farrior, B. McCall, George Crangle or Ches Harris (none of whom I consulted about this) bear me out or not, as they choose. The less pressure placed on a dog during his formative Derby year, his true elastic adolescent period, the sooner and loftier can he become polished in his next and first mature year.
In finality, it all depends on what we want — whether we really are in search of the class dog, or whether we want inhibited shooting dogs less than two years old — weak cornerstones for tomorrow’s field trial temples.

Excerpt on Locomotion

http://strideaway.com/excerpt-on-locomotion/

Excerpt on Locomotion


The crotch of a rail fence has long been an ideal place to let the rest of the world go by or watch dogs working afield.
“Dat white ’n’ liver pup ain’t never gonna be no good,” old Henry, a Negro sage, once informed this writer from his perch on the next crotch as we watched two young derbies follow an older dog through the sedge of a field below us.
“What makes you think so?” He comes from two of the best field trial Pointers that we’ve ever cut loose.” “Mabbe he do, but look at dem withers a bobbing up ’n’ down lak Miss Irene’s rocking horse. He ain’t wuth his training.”
Henry proved to be right; the pup was a washout for endurance. The reason was that he expended most of his energy in lifting his center of gravity rather than propelling it along the line of travel. His arc was not flat enough for effective travel. He fought a battle against gravity without progress. There are several structural factors, particularly in the forequarters, which bring about this result. Fatigue will cause a marked rise and fall of an animal’s withers no matter how good might be its angulation and conformation.
“Keep your eye on a horse’s withers,” a racing trainer told us once, “and you can tell exactly when he begins to peter out. No rocking horse ever won a stake race…he’s got to keep running level to bring home the bacon.” ……
We once saw a well known Setter cut loose at a field trial streak out across the open and into the cover, working it to the far edges, then swing back into the bird-field with more time than usual for combing that. All along he seemed to be gliding rather than galloping.
The very next brace brought out a dog which at a casual glance might have been his twin, but the moment he was cut loose the resemblance ceased, for even in the open he ran as if leaping a fence at each stride. He scarcely penetrated the cover, never reached the edges, cut the course and flopped into the bird-field just as the time limit expired. He had worked much harder every minute of the time but got nowhere except up and down, wearing himself out doing it.
The major cause of the excess rise and fall of the withers is improper conformation and angulation, especially the conforming of the front and rear assemblies to one another. Two factors, thrust and lift, are involved, and they must be synchronized for efficiency. Fatigue will eventually disrupt this balance in any animal and induce a pronounced rise and fall.



Well balanced front and rear assemblies allow this dog to run with an effortless gait.


Forces in the Gallop

http://strideaway.com/forces-in-the-gallop/

Forces in the Gallop



The center of gravity is “C” and the effective forward or backward force is “C F. ” “P” is for paw and “C” is for center of gravity. When the paw is on the ground behind the center of gravity as in drawings 1 and 4, the paw is giving a forward push as indicated by the resultant force “C F.” When the paw is on the ground in front of the center of gravity, the resultant force is toward the rear (DECELERATING the dog) as shown in drawings 2 and 3. These results were proven in Pressure Plate* tests.
Pressure Plate tests prove that during gait cycle forward speed of the body is not uniform, even though variation is not visible to the eye.
At the gallop of any dog, the rear paw must be on the ground in front of the center of gravity (a point about in the middle of the chest) before slow down forces develop. In the gallop, approximately 90% of time a rear paw is on the ground behind the center of gravity, and is delivering a forward thrust about 90% of the time. The front paw is behind the center of gravity only about 10% of the time, and is delivering a forward thrust only 10% of that time proving the old saying that the rear delivers the drive and the front supports the dog is true.
When considering the total energy expended (work done), it takes energy to overcome either negative or positive pressure as recorded on a pressure plate. The total energy expended is in proportion to the sum (not difference) of the positive and negative forces exerted by the paw. Negative forces increase the energy expended and decrease efficiency.
DOWNWARD FORCES
The dog’s front paws carry the extra weight of the head and neck located in front of the shoulder. In theory and fact, the front paws not only carry the greater percentage of the vertical weight but also are responsible for stopping the greater percentage of the downward force due to downward momentum. Tests prove that the front absorbs nearly 3/5ths of the dog’s downward force while the rear absorbs only 2/5ths. For this reason the front foot is always larger than the rear front by about the same proportion.
* Pressure Plates were developed (early 1980s) for quantitative gait analysis. They measure the forces applied by a foot in any direction at any instant of time.
Find “Dog Locomotion and Gait Analysis” by Curtis Brown in List of Books.

The Amesian Standard

http://strideaway.com/the-amesian-standard/


The Amesian Standard

Quail Flying

Excerpt from National Field Trial Champions 1956-1966 (William Brown), page 8:
Hobart Ames judged the National Championship for the first time in 1902. The last National he judged was in 1941 when Ariel won the first of his three National Championship titles. In that span, Mr. Ames was a judge of the National a total of 31 times, more than any other individual.
Alambagh, a setter dog won the National in 1905, the only Ames-owned dog to do so, albeit about ten years later, Powhatan came close on three occasions, gaining the newspaper distinction of runner-up.
It cannot be said that too many knew Hobart Ames well. Nor were very many familiar with his ideas of what constituted the ideal shooting dog. In the quiet precincts of his library, there were times when he would expand on his opinions, and it was these sessions, as much as anything, that provided the material which enabled Clarke Venable to phrase the type of performance sought in the National Championship and which became known as “The Amesian Standard.”

THE AMESIAN STANDARD
The dog under consideration must have and display great bird sense. He must show perfect work on both coveys and singles. He must be able quickly to determine between foot and body scent. He must use his brain, eyes, and nose to the fullest advantage and hunt the likely places on the course. He must possess speed, range, style, character, courage, and stamina—and good manners always. He must hunt the birds, and not the handler hunt the dog. No line or path runner is acceptable. He must be well broken, and the better his manners the more clearly he proves his sound training. Should he lose a little in class, as expressed in extreme speed and range, he can make up for this, under fair judgement, in a single piece of superior bird work, or in sustained demonstration of general behavior. He must be bold, snappy and spirited. His range must be to the front or to either side, but never behind. He must be regularly and habitually pleasingly governable (tractable) and must know when to turn and keep his handler’s course in view, and at all times keep uppermost in his mind the finding and pointing of birds for his handler.
Hobart Ames
Hobart Ames
Allambagh_1905 NC
1905 National Champion Alambagh